SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

References (24)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

A Psychoanalytic Interpretation of Dot.com Stock Valuations

Richard Taffler
University of Edinburgh - Accounting and Finance

David Tuckett
University of London - University College


March 1, 2005



Abstract:     
Financial economists are unable to provide plausible explanations for Internet stock valuations during the recent asset pricing bubble consistent with market rationality. Adopting a psychoanalytic perspective, this paper argues that investors became caught up emotionally with the drama leading to market prices departing in such an extreme way from fundamental value. Specifically, we propose a psychoanalytic theory of mental objects and show how this helps explain what actually took place during the different phases of dot.com mania. The paper concludes, more generally, that an understanding of how emotions determine psychic reality in stock valuations can usefully complement the contribution of conventional normative asset pricing models.

Keywords: Dot.com stocks, mania, valuation models, psychoanalysis, mental objects

JEL Classifications: G10, G12

Working Paper Series

Date posted: March 06, 2005 ; Last revised: August 17, 2008

Suggested Citation

Tuckett, David and Taffler, Richard J., A Psychoanalytic Interpretation of Dot.com Stock Valuations (March 1, 2005). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=676635


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Richard J. Taffler (Contact Author)
University of Edinburgh - Accounting and Finance ( email )
William Robertson Building
Edinburgh EH8 9JY United Kingdom
David Tuckett
University of London - University College ( email )
Exhibition Road
London SW7 2PG United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,226
Downloads: 248
Download Rank: 33,974
References: 24

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.656 seconds.