SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

References (80)

Beta

 
 

Citations (6)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

An Empirical Examination of Mutual Fund Boards

Felix Meschke
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - Carlson School of Management


March 15, 2007


Abstract:     
Agency conflicts between mutual fund investors and fund sponsors have recently received close attention from regulators and legislators. In response to improprieties regarding pricing calculations and trading deadlines, the Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted a controversial new rule requiring fund boards to have at least 75% independent directors and an independent chair person. This study examines to what extend board independence and director incentives in the mutual fund industry are systematically related to fund expenses, performance, and compliance. It is based on a novel panel dataset that covers about 60% of assets listed in the CRSP mutual fund database over the period from 1995 through 2004. The study finds that funds overseen by an independent chair charge lower fees, while the relation between fund fees and the fraction of independent directors varies through time. Both measures of board independence do not affect fund performance in an economically significant way. Funds with higher director ownership and lower unexplained compensation charge lower fees and deliver higher returns. These empirical findings are consistent with both the watchdog hypothesis, stating that greater independence and better incentive alignment causes boards to bargain harder with fund advisors, which results in lower fees, and the clientele hypothesis, suggesting that some sponsors strive to attract assets from relatively sophisticated investors who are concerned about conflicts of interest and sensitive to expenses. When attempting to empirically distinguish between these competing hypotheses, I find that boards with an independent chair negotiate lower total expenses, but approve higher management fees and that they do not have a lower probability of being subject to litigation by regulators and shareholders. In light of these results, this study finds only limited empirical support for recent initiatives to regulate mutual fund board structure.

Keywords: Board of Directors, Governance, Mutual Funds, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC Rule

JEL Classifications: G32, G34, L20

Working Paper Series

Date posted: March 19, 2008 ; Last revised: March 19, 2008

Suggested Citation

Meschke, Felix, An Empirical Examination of Mutual Fund Boards (March 15, 2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=676901


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Felix Meschke (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - Carlson School of Management ( email )
19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612 626 2583 (Phone)
612 626 1335 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.carlsonschool.umn.edu/Page2075.aspx?type=faculty&eid=38034942
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,309
Downloads: 340
Download Rank: 23,551
References: 80
Citations: 6

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.140 seconds.