|
||||
|
||||
Political Connections and Corporate Bailouts
Mara Faccio Purdue University - Krannert School of Management; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) Ronald W. Masulis Vanderbilt University - Owen Graduate School of Management; Vanderbilt University - School of Law John J. McConnell Purdue University March 1, 2005 AFA 2006 Boston Meetings Paper 61:6, 2597-2635, 2006. Abstract: We analyze the likelihood of government bailouts of a sample of 450 politically-connected (but publicly-traded) firms from 35 countries over the period 1997 through 2002. We find that politically-connected firms are significantly more likely to be bailed out than similar non-connected firms. Additionally, politically-connected firms are disproportionately more likely to be bailed out when the IMF or World Bank provide financial assistance to the firm's home country. Further, among firms that are bailed out, those that are politically-connected exhibit significantly worse financial performance than their non-connected peers at the time of the bailout and over the following two years. This evidence suggests that, at least in some countries, political connections influence the allocation of capital through the mechanism of financial assistance when connected companies confront economic distress. It may also explain prior findings that politically-connected firms borrow more than their non-connected peers.
Keywords: Political connections, cronism, bailouts JEL Classifications: G3, G28, G30, G33 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: March 25, 2005 ; Last revised: March 30, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo4 in 0.140 seconds.