|
||||
|
||||
Political Connections and Corporate BailoutsMara FaccioPurdue University - Krannert School of Management; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) Ronald W. MasulisUniversity of New South Wales - Australian School of Business; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Financial Research Network (FIRN) John J. McConnellPurdue University March 1, 2005 AFA 2006 Boston Meetings Paper Journal of Finance, Vol. 61, No. 6, pp. 2597-2635, 2006 Abstract: We analyze the likelihood of government bailouts of a sample of 450 politically-connected (but publicly-traded) firms from 35 countries over the period 1997 through 2002. We find that politically-connected firms are significantly more likely to be bailed out than similar non-connected firms. Additionally, politically-connected firms are disproportionately more likely to be bailed out when the IMF or World Bank provide financial assistance to the firm's home country. Further, among firms that are bailed out, those that are politically-connected exhibit significantly worse financial performance than their non-connected peers at the time of the bailout and over the following two years. This evidence suggests that, at least in some countries, political connections influence the allocation of capital through the mechanism of financial assistance when connected companies confront economic distress. It may also explain prior findings that politically-connected firms borrow more than their non-connected peers.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 44 Keywords: Political connections, cronism, bailouts JEL Classification: G3, G28, G30, G33 working papers seriesDate posted: March 25, 2005 ; Last revised: November 2, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.407 seconds