|
||||
|
||||
Non-Mandatory Rules in European Contract Law
Martijn W. Hesselink University of Amsterdam - Centre for the Study of European Contract Law (CSECL) European Review of Contract Law, Vol. 1, pp. 43-84, 2005 INHOUD EN WERKING VAN DE OVEREENKOMST NAAR BELGISCH EN NEDERLANDS RECHT, Jan Smits & Sophie Stijns, eds., pp. 101-134, Antwerpen & Groningen: Intersentia, 2005 PRO FORMA? ESSAYS ON THE ROLE OF FORMAL RULES AND FORMAL REQUIREMENTS IN PRIVATE LAW, A.F. Salomons & G.J.P. de Vries, eds., pp. 139-174, The Hague: Boom Juridische uitgevers, 2006 Abstract: This paper examines whether the European Union should enact one or more sets of non-mandatory rules of contract law. In order to be able to answer this question, it examines several perspectives on non-mandatory rules and concludes that there is no decisive, merely "technical" answer; the question is political. The paper further shows that, in spite of the principle of freedom of contract, many "non-mandatory rules" are de facto mandatory. This leads to the conclusion that, in this respect, there is no categorical difference between mandatory rules and non-mandatory rules. The consequence is, on the one hand, that there is no reason to exclude non-mandatory rules as a category from unification efforts with regard to contract law, whereas, on the other, a political process is necessary with regard to non-mandatory rules which assures that the important political choices are made in a democratic way.
Keywords: Default Rules, Mandatory Rules, Contract Law, European Law JEL Classifications: K12 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 04, 2005 ; Last revised: November 13, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.110 seconds.