Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=680682
 
 

Citations (3)



 
 

Footnotes (274)



 


 



Improving Criminal Jury Decision Making After the Blakely Revolution


J.J. Prescott


University of Michigan Law School

Sonja B. Starr


University of Michigan Law School


University of Illinois Law Review, p. 301, 2006
Michigan Law and Economic Research Paper No. 05-004

Abstract:     
The shift in sentencing fact-finding responsibility triggered in many states by Blakely v. Washington may dramatically change the complexity and type of questions that juries will be required to answer. Among the most important challenges confronting legislatures now debating the future of their sentencing regimes is whether juries are prepared to handle this new responsibility effectively - and, if not, what can be done about it. Yet neither scholars addressing the impact of Blakely nor advocates of jury reform have seriously explored these questions. Nonetheless, a number of limitations on juror decision making seriously threaten the accuracy of verdicts in systems where juries are given a more prominent role in finding sentencing facts. In this article, we assess the capacity of juries to analyze and deliberate on sentencing-related facts. We consider, inter alia, problems of cognitive overload, frustration and loss of motivation due to complex structures, difficulties evaluating evidence that juries do not ordinarily consider, distortions due to the framing of nonbinary questions, and deliberation-related biases. We also propose a model for sentencing-stage jury proceedings that would minimize these problems. Its components include bifurcation of proceedings, partial application of the rules of evidence, special verdict forms that are carefully designed to minimize framing effects, structural simplification of sentencing tasks, a more active jury, and guidance for jurors on bias-reducing deliberation structures.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 56

Keywords: criminal law, criminal procedure, litigation, evidence, sentencing, Apprendi, Blakely, Booker, fact-finding, juries, law and economics, law and psychology, group behavior

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 8, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Prescott, J.J. and Starr, Sonja B., Improving Criminal Jury Decision Making After the Blakely Revolution. University of Illinois Law Review, p. 301, 2006; Michigan Law and Economic Research Paper No. 05-004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=680682 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.680682

Contact Information

J.J. Prescott (Contact Author)
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
3170 South Hall
701 S. State St.
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
United States
734-763-2326 (Phone)

Sonja B. Starr
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 South State St
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
United States
617 821-1222 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,003
Downloads: 352
Download Rank: 47,947
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  274

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.328 seconds