SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Citations (2)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Disagreement and Learning: Dynamic Patterns of Trade

Snehal Banerjee
Northwestern University - Department of Finance

Ilan Kremer
Stanford Graduate School of Business


August 04, 2009

Journal of Finance forthcoming

Abstract:     
The empirical evidence on investor disagreement and trading volume is difficult to reconcile in standard rational expectations models. We develop a dynamic model in which investors disagree about the interpretations of public information. We obtain a closed-form linear equilibrium that allows us to study what restrictions on the disagreement process yield empirically observed volume and return dynamics. We show that when investors have infrequent but major disagreements, there is positive autocorrelation in volume and positive correlation between volume and price volatility. We also derive novel empirical predictions that relate the degree and frequency of disagreement to volume and volatility dynamics.

Keywords: Difference of opinions, autocorrelation in volume, correlation in price changes and volume

JEL Classifications: D8, G1

Working Paper Series

Date posted: March 23, 2005 ; Last revised: August 06, 2009

Suggested Citation

Banerjee, Snehal and Kremer, Ilan, Disagreement and Learning: Dynamic Patterns of Trade (August 04, 2009). Journal of Finance forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=687268


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Snehal Banerjee (Contact Author)
Northwestern University - Department of Finance ( email )
2001 Sheridan Road
Evanston, IL 60208
United States
Ilan Kremer
Stanford Graduate School of Business ( email )
518 Memorial Way
Stanford, CA 94305-5015
United States

Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,335
Downloads: 255
Download Rank: 32,925
Citations: 2

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo4 in 0.109 seconds.