Psychological Impediments to Mediation Success: Theory and Practice
Russell B. Korobkin
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law
Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, Vol. 21, pp. 281-238, 2006
UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 05-9
Some disputes should fail to settle in mediation because there is no agreement that is preferable to adjudication for all of the parties. Mediation can also fail as a consequence of strategic behavior or attorney-client conflicts of interest. This article examines impediments to mediation success rooted in cognitive and social psychology, combining academic research on the psychology of bargaining and dispute resolution with mediation practice. The article examines how the overconfidence bias, the fundamental attribution error, the framing of risky choices, reactive devaluation, and concerns with interactional justice can impede mediation success to the detriment of the litigating parties. It also proposes actions mediators can take to mitigate these impediments and help the disputants to reach mutually acceptable settlement agreements.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26
Keywords: Mediation, Negotiation, PsychologyAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 21, 2005
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.469 seconds