Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=693862
 


 



Legal History for a Dummy: A Comment on the Role of History in Judicial Interpretation of the Confrontation Clause


Peter Tillers


Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

2005

Cardozo Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 110

Abstract:     
Judges can neither do good legal history nor recognize good legal history. Q.E.D.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: Confrontation Clause, Legal History, Misuse of Legal History

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 9, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Tillers, Peter, Legal History for a Dummy: A Comment on the Role of History in Judicial Interpretation of the Confrontation Clause (2005). Cardozo Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 110. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=693862 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.693862

Contact Information

Peter Tillers (Contact Author)
Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )
55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States
212-790-0334 (Phone)
212-790-0205 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,813
Downloads: 235
Download Rank: 59,881

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.297 seconds