SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (98)

Beta

 


 



The Ambiguous Meaning of Human Conception

Philip G. Peters Jr.
University of Missouri at Columbia - School of Law



U of Missouri-Columbia School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2006-40
UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 40, p. 199, 2006

Abstract:     
Nearly all of the state and federal laws that treat embryos as persons contain a fundamental ambiguity. Contrary to common belief, there is no "moment" of conception. Instead, conception is a forty-eight hour process, during which the haploid genomes of the sperm and egg are gradually and precisely transformed into the functioning diploid genome of a new human embryo. During that two-day period, many common clinical and laboratories activities take place, including the culling of unsuitable embryos, the freezing of others, and the testing of embryos for genetic abnormalities. The legal status of these activities will turn on the point in the two-day process of conception that is chosen to trigger the life-begins-at-conception laws.

In this Article, I argue that laws triggered by conception should not take effect until the process of conceiving a new diploid embryo is complete. This occurs when the embryonic genome begins to function, roughly forty-eight hours after insemination, at the eight-cell stage. Prior to that, a new human life is being conceived, but has not yet been conceived. Although many people will find this a surprising conclusion, it is consistent with both the gradual nature of the transformation from gametes to embryo and with the goals that the authors of these laws sought to accomplish.

Keywords: Conception, fertilization, embryo

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: April 07, 2005 ; Last revised: December 07, 2006

Suggested Citation

Peters Jr., Philip G., The Ambiguous Meaning of Human Conception. U of Missouri-Columbia School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2006-40; UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 40, p. 199, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=694102 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.694102


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Philip G. Peters (Contact Author)
University of Missouri at Columbia - School of Law ( email )
Missouri Avenue & Conley Avenue
Hulston Hall
Columbia, MO 65211
United States
573-882-8274 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.missouri.edu/peters/
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 951
Downloads: 99
Download Rank: 86,171
Footnotes: 98

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollob 5 in 0.219 seconds.