|
||||
|
||||
Corporate Governance and Acquirer Returns
Ronald W. Masulis Vanderbilt University - Owen Graduate School of Management; Vanderbilt University - School of Law Cong Wang Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) - Department of Finance Fei Xie George Mason University - School of Management ECGI-Finance Working Paper No. 116/2006 Journal of Finance, Forthcoming Abstract: We examine whether corporate governance mechanisms, especially the market for corporate control, affect the profitability of firm acquisitions. We find that acquirers with more anti-takeover provisions experience significantly lower announcement-period stock returns than other acquirers. We also find that acquiring firms operating in more competitive industries or separating the positions of CEO and chairman of the board experience higher abnormal announcement returns. Our results support the hypothesis that managers protected by more anti-takeover provisions face weaker discipline from the market for corporate control and thus, are more likely to indulge in empire-building acquisitions that destroy shareholder value. They provide a partial explanation for why anti-takeover provision indices of Gompers, Ishii and Metrick and others are negatively correlated with shareholder value.
Keywords: Corporate Governance, Anti-takeover Provisions, Takeover Protection, Market for Corporate Control, Acquisitions, Acquisition Profitability, Agency Problems JEL Classifications: G34, G14, D84, D21, D23 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 11, 2005 ; Last revised: May 21, 2007Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.140 seconds.