WTO Dispute Resolution and the Preservation of the Public Domain of Science under International Law
Graeme B. Dinwoodie
University of Oxford - Faculty of Law
Rochelle C. Dreyfuss
New York University - School of Law
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC, GOODS AND TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY UNDER A GLOBALIZED INTELLIECTUAL PROPERTY REGIME, Maskus and Reichman, eds., Cambridge Univiverstiy, 2005
The TRIPS Agreement can be read to reflect a static view of the structure of intellectual property law. In this paper, we address whether - and how - the TRIPS Agreement can be interpreted to give it more fluidity, and thus to allow adjustments in national intellectual property regimes designed to reflect the dynamic nature of information production. To focus that inquiry, we concentrate on efforts to ensure a broader public domain for "upstream" inventions by modifying various elements of US patent law. The paper considers three stylized examples and asks whether each approach could be adopted by the United States without falling afoul of the TRIPS Agreement, as it is currently understood. Our purpose is to identify interpretive approaches that allow member states to keep their laws attuned to the developments and needs of science. In so doing, we also raise broader questions regarding the level of formalism generated by the WTO dispute settlement system, and the extent to which the TRIPS Agreement allocates power between supranational and national institutions, and between international and national laws.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22
Keywords: extraterritoriality, dispute reolution, TRIPS, WTO
JEL Classification: K11, K33Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 20, 2005
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.359 seconds