SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (202)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Internet Filtering in China in 2004-2005: A Country Study

Derek E. Bambauer
Brooklyn Law School

Ronald J. Deibert
University of Toronto - Munk Centre for International Studies

John G. Palfrey Jr.
Harvard Law School

Rafal Rohozinski
University of Cambridge

Nart Villeneuve
University of Toronto - Munk Centre for International Studies

Jonathan Zittrain
Harvard Law School


April 15, 2005

Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School Research Publication No. 2005-10

Abstract:     
China's Internet filtering regime is the most sophisticated effort of its kind in the world. Compared to similar efforts in other states, China's filtering regime is pervasive, sophisticated, and effective. It comprises multiple levels of legal regulation and technical control. It involves numerous state agencies and thousands of public and private personnel. It censors content transmitted through multiple methods, including Web pages, Web logs, on-line discussion forums, university bulletin board systems, and e-mail messages. Our testing found efforts to prevent access to a wide range of sensitive materials, from pornography to religious material to political dissent. We sought to determine the degree to which China filters sites on topics that the Chinese government finds sensitive, and found that the state does so extensively. Chinese citizens seeking access to Web sites containing content related to Taiwanese and Tibetan independence, Falun Gong, the Dalai Lama, the Tiananmen Square incident, opposition political parties, or a variety of anti-Communist movements will frequently find themselves blocked. Contrary to anecdote, we found that most major American media sites, such as CNN, MSNBC, and ABC, are generally available in China (though the BBC remains blocked). Moreover, most sites we tested in our global list's human rights and anonymizer categories are accessible as well. While it is difficult to describe this widespread filtering with precision, our research documents a system that imposes strong controls on its citizens' ability to view and to publish Internet content. This report was produced by the OpenNet Initiative, a partnership among the Advanced Network Research Group, Cambridge Security Programme at Cambridge University, the Citizen Lab at the Munk Centre for International Studies, University of Toronto, and the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School.

Keywords: Internet web filtering, government, China, ONI points of control

JEL Classifications: K1, K19, O3, P26, Z00

Working Paper Series

Date posted: April 26, 2005 ; Last revised: December 20, 2005

Contact Information

Jonathan Zittrain (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-495-4643 (Phone)
617-495-7641 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.jz.org
Derek E. Bambauer
Brooklyn Law School ( email )
250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States
7344377660 (Phone)
Ronald J. Deibert
University of Toronto - Munk Centre for International Studies ( email )
Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E6 Canada
John G. Palfrey Jr.
Harvard Law School ( email )
1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Rafal Rohozinski
University of Cambridge ( email )
CB3 9DD Cambridge United Kingdom
Nart Villeneuve
University of Toronto - Munk Centre for International Studies ( email )
Toronto, Ontario Canada
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,805
Downloads: 486
Download Rank: 14,857
Footnotes: 202

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo4 in 0.360 seconds.