Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=707563
 
 

Citations (4)



 
 

Footnotes (67)



 


 



Of Patents and Path Dependency: A Comment on Burk and Lemley


R. Polk Wagner


University of Pennsylvania Law School


Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 18, p. 1341, 2004

Abstract:     
This Article delves into issues surrounding the relationship between technology and the patent law. Responding to Dan Burk and Mark Lemley's earlier article, Is Patent Law Technology-Specific?, the piece notes that the basic question posed by Burk and Lemley's article is a relatively easy question given the several doctrines that explicitly link the subject matter context of an invention to the validity and scope of related patents. This sort of technological exceptionalism (which this Article refers to as micro-exceptionalism) is both observable and easily justifiable for a legal regime directed to technology policy. In contrast, Burk and Lemley's identification of, and advocacy for, a broader sort of exceptionalism (macro-exceptionalism) is far more troublesome, implying a role for the patent judiciary in rather detailed policy judgments, for example the optimal breadth for biotechnological or software-based patents. The Article offers a variety of reasons that macro-exceptionalism is unwarranted, and indeed, notes that a primary claim of Burk and Lemley's - that the Federal Circuit has grossly missed the mark in its (purportedly) exceptionalist approach - previews the sort of problems created by pursuing technological exceptionalism in the patent law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: patents, Federal Circuit, patent law, innovation, exceptionalism, technology

JEL Classification: K2, K11, L5

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 20, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Wagner, R. Polk, Of Patents and Path Dependency: A Comment on Burk and Lemley. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 18, p. 1341, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=707563

Contact Information

R. Polk Wagner (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
267-433-4431 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 915
Downloads: 108
Download Rank: 147,320
Citations:  4
Footnotes:  67
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Understanding Patent Quality Mechanisms
By R. Polk Wagner

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.281 seconds