Rivalrous Telecommunications Networks With and Without Mandatory Sharing
Thomas W. Hazlett
affiliation not provided to SSRN
AEI-Brookings Joint Center Working Paper No. 05-07
The 1996 Telecoms Act featured policy successes and failures. Among the former are federal rules pre-empting state monopolies and the mandate for network interconnection. Among the latter is the mandatory sharing regime for fixed line telephone networks, over-turned by federal courts after eight years. Such regulation required delicate balancing in order to encourage competitive entry while simultaneously protecting investment incentives for new or existing service providers. Fortuitously, the emergence of competing voice and data networks has proceeded - not due to such rules, but despite them. Evidence indicates that wholesale price controls did not provide a "stepping stone" to facilities-based competition, while the elimination of such rules has. Marketplace experience suggests that competitive networks most likely develop not from "opening" existing delivery platforms to multiple operators, but from policies nurturing the development of rival infrastructure in adjacent markets or the adoption of alternative technologies. Foremost among these are policies to encourage investment in broadband and wireless communications networks.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 45
Keywords: telecommunications, act, 1996, mandatory, sharing, rivalrous
JEL Classification: H00
Date posted: April 20, 2005
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.609 seconds