Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=711103
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (111)



 


 



Pre-Natal Fictions and Post-Partum Actions


Ian R. Kerr


University of Ottawa - Common Law Section


Dalhousie Law Journal, Vol. 20, p. 237-274, 1997

Abstract:     
The author examines the theory of liability for pre-natal injuries adopted by Canadian courts. This theory has recently been adopted by the New Brunswick Court of Appeal in an unprecedented decision that allows an infant to sue its own mother for alleged negligent conduct that occurred prior to the child's birth. The author argues that, despite contrary claims, the present theory of liability relies on the judicial use of a legal fiction. He maintains that this fiction has been stretched beyond its theoretical limits and concludes that courts are no longer justified in adopting the present theory of liability in cases where a child sues its own mother. He ends by suggesting that courts must undertake a deeper analysis of the issues relevant to a determination of the proper scope of recovery for pre-natal injuries.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 38

Keywords: Pre-natal injuries, liability, legal fictions, children's rights

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 1, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Kerr, Ian R., Pre-Natal Fictions and Post-Partum Actions. Dalhousie Law Journal, Vol. 20, p. 237-274, 1997. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=711103

Contact Information

Ian R. Kerr (Contact Author)
University of Ottawa - Common Law Section ( email )
57 Louis Pasteur Street
Ottawa, K1N 6N5
Canada
613-562-5800 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 575
Downloads: 41
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  111

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.235 seconds