Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=711363
 


 



U.S. v. Mead: Complicating the Delegation Dance


William S. Jordan III III


University of Akron - School of Law


Environmental Law Reporter, Vol. 31, pp. 11425-11437, Nov. 2001
U of Akron Legal Studies Research Paper No. 05-18

Abstract:     
Professor Jordan critiques the Supreme Court's decision in U.S. v. Mead. Likening Mead to the addition of several steps to the existing, relatively simple, Chevron dance, Professor Jordan argues that Mead has considerably complicated judicial review of agency statutory interpretations. He suggests that it will take several years before we understand the full impact of U.S. v. Mead.

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: April 26, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Jordan III, William S., U.S. v. Mead: Complicating the Delegation Dance. Environmental Law Reporter, Vol. 31, pp. 11425-11437, Nov. 2001; U of Akron Legal Studies Research Paper No. 05-18. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=711363

Contact Information

William S. Jordan III (Contact Author)
University of Akron - School of Law ( email )
150 University Ave.
Akron, OH 44325-2901
United States
330-972-6751 (Phone)
330-258-2343 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 346

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.313 seconds