Multiproduct Discounting: A Myth of Nonprice Predation
Daniel A. Crane
University of Michigan Law School
University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 72, p. 27, 2005
Abstract:
This essay in the University of Chicago Law Review's Antitrust Symposium challenges the view adopted in the Third Circuit's en banc decision in LePage's v. 3M with respect to multiproduct discounting. It argues that mixed bundling is a pervasive, and generally pro-consumer, form of price competition that should be disapproved only where it effectively amounts to predatory pricing.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23
Keywords: antitrust, predatory pricing
Accepted Paper Series
Suggested Citation
Crane, Daniel A., Multiproduct Discounting: A Myth of Nonprice Predation. University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 72, p. 27, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=711862
