Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=711923
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (107)



 


 



Death-Qualification and True Bifurcation: Building on the Massachusetts Governor's Council's Work


Sam Kamin


University of Denver Sturm College of Law

Jeffrey J. Pokorak


Suffolk University Law School


Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 80, p. 131, 2005

Abstract:     
In this essay we build on the work of the Massachusetts Governor's Council's on Capital Punishment and the ideas developed at a conference at Indiana University, using both as a spring-board for the formulation of an appropriate set of procedures for death-qualification in capital trials. In particular, we recommend the following approach to death-qualification and bifurcation in a capital trial:

A capital defendant should be given the option of electing to have a separate jury impaneled for the sentencing phase of the trial, in the event that the guilt-phase jury convicts him of capital murder. The defendant should be allowed to exercise this option either prior to the guilt phase of the trial, or after conviction of capital murder. If the defendant makes a pretrial election to have a separate jury impaneled for sentencing, then the guilt-phase jury will not be death-qualified. If the defendant decides to defer the election until after conviction of capital murder, then the guilt-phase jury will be death-qualified.

We argue in this essay that this approach meets both a state's interest in impaneling a jury willing to comply with its charge and the defendant's interest in having a jury as impartial as both practical and possible. While the procedures that we propose might require a greater expenditure of time and resources than currently-conducted capital trials, we believe such incremental increase is more than justified by the significant enhancement to fairness that such a system would provide. In fact, we argue that any state that takes seriously the goals of creating as fair a death penalty system as possible ought to include such a plan for true bifurcation and limited death-qualification.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: capital punishment, legislation, reform, death qualification, bifurcated trial

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 29, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Kamin, Sam and Pokorak, Jeffrey J., Death-Qualification and True Bifurcation: Building on the Massachusetts Governor's Council's Work. Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 80, p. 131, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=711923

Contact Information

Sam Kamin
University of Denver Sturm College of Law ( email )
2255 E. Evans Avenue
Denver, CO 80208
United States
303-871-6125 (Phone)
303-871-6711 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://law.du.edu/index.php/profile/sam-kamin
Jeffrey J. Pokorak (Contact Author)
Suffolk University Law School ( email )
120 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02108-4977
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,899
Downloads: 102
Download Rank: 149,196
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  107

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.500 seconds