Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=712229
 
 

Footnotes (51)



 


 



Constructing a Doctrine of Economic Duress


Daniel S. Tan


Dan Tan Law


Construction Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 87-96, 2002

Abstract:     
Construction cases have played a pivotal role developing the doctrine of economic duress. In the seminal case of Williams v. Roffrey Brothers, the Court of Appeal, by taking an expansive view of the doctrine of consideration, established economic duress as the device for policing renegotiation of contracts. Recently, the cases of DSND Subsea v. Petroleum Geo-Services and Carillion Construction Limited v. Felix (U.K.) Limited in the Technology and Construction Court have resulted in further development.

This article argues that the doctrine emerging from the cases may be difficult to reconcile with established contractual principles. A more predictable approach, drawing on established legal principles, is then proposed.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: contract, duress, economic duress, construction, vitiating factors, restitution, pressure, causation, economic

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 4, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Tan, Daniel S., Constructing a Doctrine of Economic Duress. Construction Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 87-96, 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=712229

Contact Information

Daniel S. Tan (Contact Author)
Dan Tan Law ( email )
175 Varick Street
New York, NY 10014
United States
646 580 0080 (Phone)
212 330 7642 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,667
Downloads: 502
Download Rank: 29,817
Footnotes:  51

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.313 seconds