Footnotes (51)



Constructing a Doctrine of Economic Duress

Daniel S. Tan

Dan Tan Law

Construction Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 87-96, 2002

Construction cases have played a pivotal role developing the doctrine of economic duress. In the seminal case of Williams v. Roffrey Brothers, the Court of Appeal, by taking an expansive view of the doctrine of consideration, established economic duress as the device for policing renegotiation of contracts. Recently, the cases of DSND Subsea v. Petroleum Geo-Services and Carillion Construction Limited v. Felix (U.K.) Limited in the Technology and Construction Court have resulted in further development.

This article argues that the doctrine emerging from the cases may be difficult to reconcile with established contractual principles. A more predictable approach, drawing on established legal principles, is then proposed.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: contract, duress, economic duress, construction, vitiating factors, restitution, pressure, causation, economic

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 4, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Tan, Daniel S., Constructing a Doctrine of Economic Duress. Construction Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 87-96, 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=712229

Contact Information

Daniel S. Tan (Contact Author)
Dan Tan Law ( email )
175 Varick Street
New York, NY 10014
United States
646 580 0080 (Phone)
212 330 7642 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,862
Downloads: 538
Download Rank: 32,119
Footnotes:  51

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.313 seconds