An Experimental Comparison of Adversarial Versus Inquisitorial Procedural Regimes
Michael K. Block
University of Arizona
Jeffrey S. Parker
George Mason University School of Law
University of Chicago - Department of Economics
American Law and Economics Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 170-194, 2000
This article reports the results of a multiyear series of economic experiments comparing the two dominant types of legal procedures used in adjudication: (1) the 'adversarial' model of party-controlled procedure versus (2) the 'inquisitorial' model of judge-controlled procedure. The principal finding is that the relative fact-finding efficiency of the two systems, in terms of both the 'revelation' of hidden facts and the 'accuracy' of decision, depends significantly upon the information structure. Under a 'private' information structure, inquisitorial procedure is relatively more efficient, whereas under a 'correlated' information structure, adversarial procedure is relatively more efficient.
Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 29, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.453 seconds