Victims, Survivors and the Decisions to Seek and Impose Death
Wayne A. Logan
Florida State University - College of Law
William Mitchell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12
FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 235
This paper examines the constitutional, legal, and ethical issues regarding the consideration of victim and survivor sentiments, and victim characteristics, in deciding to seek and impose the death penalty. While in theory prosecutorial decisions to seek death and judge or juror decisions to impose it are driven by the heinousness of the killing and the culpability of the killer, in practice a range of other considerations often influence such decisions. This is especially so in the wake of the Supreme Court's landmark 1991 decision in Payne v. Tennessee, where the Court sanctioned use of victim impact evidence in capital trials, allowing survivors of murder victims to testify of the social, emotional and economic losses resulting from the murder. The paper surveys the diverse range of victim impact evidence admitted in courts today and the rules governing its admission. In addition, it considers the propriety of consideration being given in death penalty decisions to (i) victim characteristics and (ii) the views of victims and survivors on the propriety of capital punishment itself.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26
Keywords: death penalty, capital, victim, victims' rights, PayneAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 2, 2005
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.484 seconds