Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=715581
 
 

Footnotes (216)



 


 



Challenges and Implications of a Systemic Social Effect Theory


Aaron Xavier Fellmeth


Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law


University of Illinois Law Review, 2005

Abstract:     
In Civil and Criminal Sanctions in the Constitution and Courts, the author critiqued and ultimately rejected the suitability of the Supreme Court's combination of deference to legislative intent and multifactor analysis as an appropriate basis for protecting the civil rights of persons the state threatens with punishment. The article proposed a very different test for distinguishing civil and criminal sanctions based on the type of threats posed to the rights protected by constitutionally enhanced procedural protections. The approach, called the "Systemic Social Effect Theory" (SSET), required distinguishing between civil and criminal sanctions based on whether the sanction has the systemic social effect of punishing those convicted of the relevant violation of law. Civil and Criminal Sanctions in the Constitution and Courts left two important subjects for future consideration, however. First, the centrality of the subject to a panoply of important jurisprudential questions has motivated several authors to offer proposals for distinguishing between civil and criminal sanctions either generally or for specific purposes. These alternatives are considered in light of the politico-ethical theories underlying the Constitution to determine how they stack up against the SSET. Once it has been shown that the SSET offers the best basis for distinguishing between civil and criminal sanctions for all potential and actual defendants, the implications of the SSET for many areas of law appear quite radical. The Court's current distinction between civil and criminal sanctions, as well as several approaches proposed by other authors, permit a variety of punitive measures to fall within the definition "civil" sanctions that do not necessitate enhanced procedural protections in the treatment of the suspect or defendant. The SSET dictates that a variety of punishments, including punitive damages, civil fines and forfeitures, and disbarment may require that the Constitution's enhanced procedural protections be afforded to the suspect or defendant.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 58

Keywords: Civil penalties, punitive damages, criminal law, civil rights, punishment

JEL Classification: K14

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 7, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Fellmeth, Aaron Xavier, Challenges and Implications of a Systemic Social Effect Theory. University of Illinois Law Review, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=715581

Contact Information

Aaron Xavier Fellmeth (Contact Author)
Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 838
Downloads: 51
Download Rank: 231,295
Footnotes:  216

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.250 seconds