The New Censorship: Institutional Review Boards
Columbia University - Law School
U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 95
Are federal regulations on Institutional Review Boards - commonly known as IRBs - compatible with the First Amendment? The regulations aim to protect human subjects by creating a system of licensing research. Under this system, universities establish IRBs, and researchers must get the prior permission of an IRB before doing research on human subjects. At first glance, it may seem only appropriate that researchers should get permission before performing research on human beings. The First Amendment, however, prohibits the federal government from imposing a system of licensing speech or the press, and it therefore seems necessary to consider whether the regulations on IRBs are unconstitutional.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 85
Keywords: First Amendment, Censorship, Academic Freedom, Institutional Review Boards, Unconstitutional Conditions
JEL Classification: I18, K10, K32working papers series
Date posted: May 17, 2005
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.746 seconds