Footnotes (123)



Extraterritorial Courts for Corporate Law

Henry Hansmann

Yale Law School; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)

Jens Dammann

University of Texas at Austin - School of Law

May 2005

ECGI - Law Working Paper No. 43/2005
U of Texas law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 056
Yale ICF Working Paper No. 05-12
Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 102
Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 315

A central goal in devising a system of courts is to make judicial services easily accessible. As a consequence, justice is usually administered in a geographically decentralized fashion: trial courts are distributed across the territory in which the jurisdiction's law is applied. Corporate law, however, does not fit this pattern: courts are often located far away from the companies subject to their jurisdiction. In particular, Delaware law governs most publicly traded firms in the U.S., and is now extending its reach to encompass corporations headquartered around the globe. But Delaware courts are located only in Delaware. Consequently, there is a large and growing disparity between the geographic area where Delaware law is applied and the location of Delaware courts. This disparity is all the more striking because the quality of the Delaware judiciary is a prime reason why firms incorporate under Delaware law. This situation provokes a simple question: would it not be both desirable and feasible to have Delaware, and other jurisdictions whose law has extraterritorial reach, hold hearings and trials out of state? The creation of such extraterritorial courts might well yield significant benefits: litigation costs could be lowered, and regulatory competition between jurisdictions could be increased with regard to both substantive corporate law and judicial services.

This paper explores the issues involved in such a regime of extraterritorial courts. We consider those issues as they arise within the U.S., within the EU, and globally. We largely limit our analysis to courts whose jurisdiction is confined to corporate law. We note, however, that much of what we say applies as well to other areas of commercial law. Moreover, whatever the merits of extraterritorial courts as a practical proposal, in exploring their promise we gain important perspective on the basic relationships among substantive law, adjudication, and territoriality, and on the differences between private arbitration and public adjudication.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

Keywords: extraterritorial, courts, Delaware, regulatory competition, arbitration, soverignity, jurisdiction

JEL Classification: F23, K00, K22, K33, K40

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 16, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Hansmann, Henry and Dammann, Jens, Extraterritorial Courts for Corporate Law (May 2005). ECGI - Law Working Paper No. 43/2005; U of Texas law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 056; Yale ICF Working Paper No. 05-12; Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 102; Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 315. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=724165 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.724165

Contact Information

Henry Hansmann (Contact Author)
Yale Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
203-432-4966 (Phone)

European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)
B-1050 Brussels
HOME PAGE: http://www.ecgi.org
Jens Dammann
University of Texas at Austin - School of Law ( email )
727 East Dean Keeton Street
Austin, TX 78705
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,577
Downloads: 745
Download Rank: 23,674
Footnotes:  123

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.187 seconds