|
||||
|
||||
Protecting Early Innovators: Should Second-Generation Products be Patentable?Suzanne ScotchmerUniversity of California - Department of Economics ; School of Law, University of California, Berkeley; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) RAND J. OF ECONOMICS, Vol. 27 No. 2 Abstract: Incentives to develop basic technologies are greater if the patentholder profits from applications or other second-generation products. Assuming that such products infringe the basic patent and that there is not much delay between the innovations, I argue that (i) patents on second-generation products are not necessary to encourage their development and (ii) the patentholder of the basic technology collects a larger share of the profit if applications or other second generation products are not patentable.
JEL Classification: O31 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: July 8, 1998Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.515 seconds