SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (284)

Beta

 


 



Good Faith Business Judgment: A Theory of Rhetoric in Corporate Law Jurisprudence

Sean J. Griffith
Fordham Law School



Duke Law Journal, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2005

Abstract:     
This Article develops a theory of rhetoric in corporate law jurisprudence. It begins by examining a recent innovation in Delaware case-law: the emerging principle of "good faith." Good faith is an old notion in law generally, but it offers to bring significant change to corporate law, including realignment of the business judgment rule and a shift in the traditional balance between the authority of boards and the accountability of boards to courts. The Article argues, however, that good faith functions as a rhetorical device rather than a substantive standard. That is, it operates as a speech-act, a performance, as opposed to a careful method of analysis.

To explain the sudden appearance of good faith, this Article articulates a model of corporate law rhetoric. Courts invent rhetorical devices to loosen corporate law doctrine and increase judicial review of board decision-making in response to scandals and other extra-legal pressures operating upon the judiciary. These pressures stem largely from the twin threats of corporate migration and federal pre-emption, both of which imperil the primacy of the Delaware judiciary as a corporate law-maker. In periods of crisis and scandal, the judiciary employs rhetorical devices to reduce these pressures, typically with the effect of increasing board accountability, only to return, once the pressure recedes, to a position of board deference. After finding several examples of this pattern in corporate law history, this Article argues, ultimately, that regular movement back and forth along the authority/accountability spectrum is an essential feature of corporate law jurisprudence and that understanding the rhetorical devices that permit this movement is necessary to complete any account of what corporate law is and how it works.

Keywords: Good faith, fiduciary duty, loyalty, care, corporate law, jurisprudence, Delaware, shareholder litigation, disney, rhetoric, authority, accountability, thaumatrope

JEL Classifications: K00, K22

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: May 25, 2005 ; Last revised: February 03, 2006

Suggested Citation

Griffith, Sean J., Good Faith Business Judgment: A Theory of Rhetoric in Corporate Law Jurisprudence. Duke Law Journal, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=728431


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Sean J. Griffith (Contact Author)
Fordham Law School ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,816
Downloads: 567
Download Rank: 12,617
Footnotes: 284

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.188 seconds.