Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=729163
 
 

Footnotes (160)



 


 



Dickerson v. United States: The Case that Disappointed Miranda's Critics - And then its Supporters


Yale Kamisar


University of San Diego School of Law; University of Michigan Law School

May 2005

San Diego Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-18

Abstract:     
It is difficult, if not impossible, to discuss Dickerson v. United States intelligently without discussing Miranda, whose constitutional status Dickerson reaffirmed (or, one might say, resuscitated). It is also difficult, if not impossible, to discuss the Dickerson case intelligently without discussing cases the Court has handed down in the five years since Dickerson was decided. The hard truth is that in those five years the reaffirmation of Miranda's constitutional status has become less and less meaningful.

In this paper I want to focus on the Court's characterization of statements elicited in violation of the Miranda warnings as not actually "coerced" or "compelled" but obtained merely in violation of Miranda's "prophylactic rules." This terminology has plagued the Miranda doctrine and puzzled and provoked many commentators since then - Justice Rehnquist utilized this label to describe and to diminish Miranda - and he was the first Justice ever to do so - thirty-one years ago.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 46

Keywords: Miranda warnings, prophylactic rules, rights against self incrimination, constitutional protection

JEL Classification: K10

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 25, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Kamisar, Yale, Dickerson v. United States: The Case that Disappointed Miranda's Critics - And then its Supporters (May 2005). San Diego Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-18. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=729163 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.729163

Contact Information

Yale Kamisar (Contact Author)
University of San Diego School of Law ( email )
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States
619-260-4600, x8827 (Phone)
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,411
Downloads: 317
Download Rank: 51,225
Footnotes:  160

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.891 seconds