Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=730625
 
 

Footnotes (42)



 


 



Bad Writing: Some Thoughts on the Abuse of Scholarly Rhetoric


Jethro K. Lieberman


New York Law School


New York Law School Law Review, Vol. 49, pp. 649-664, 2004-2005

Abstract:     
Like most kinds of writing, academic writing rarely shines, but far more often than ordinary writing scholarly prose is murky and impenetrable. This brief jeu d'esprit considers several forms of bad writing, rejecting the claim, increasingly made in academic quarters, that "difficult writing" is necessary to the scholarly enterprise. Bloated, foggy, and enigmatic prose masquerades as profundity that escapes conventional mental grooves. In fact it is useless, unethical, and taken far enough, evil.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: academic writing, scholarly writing, bad writing, writing problem, scholarship,composition, clarity, ethics, prose, rhetoric, style, obscurity, Orwell, Dewey

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 28, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Lieberman, Jethro K., Bad Writing: Some Thoughts on the Abuse of Scholarly Rhetoric. New York Law School Law Review, Vol. 49, pp. 649-664, 2004-2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=730625

Contact Information

Jethro K. Lieberman (Contact Author)
New York Law School ( email )
185 West Broadway
New York, NY 10013
United States
212-431-2378 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,714
Downloads: 724
Download Rank: 17,314
Footnotes:  42

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.438 seconds