Pollution Incidence and Political Jurisdiction: Evidence from the TRI
Andrew B. Whitford
University of Georgia - Department of Public Administration and Policy
Claremont McKenna College - Robert Day School of Economics and Finance; RAND
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 403-424, 2003
Few issues are more contentious for local communities than industrial pollution. When local industries pollute, lawmakers and regulators must balance two primary concerns: economic prosperity and the environment. The role of political pressure is well-documented in environmental policy. What is less clear is the role jurisdictional or boundary considerations play in determining the implementation of environmental laws. Anecdotal evidence suggests that local regulators are more lenient in their treatment of polluters when the incidence of pollution falls partially on those outside the state. One explanation for such behavior is that regulators take actions to maximize political support. This paper tests this jurisdictional model using Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) data from 1987 to 1996. We find that facilities' emissions into the air and water are systematically higher in counties that border other states. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that jurisdictional considerations are an important determinant of pollution incidence.
Keywords: environmental federalism, environmental policy, environmental enforcement, environmental regulation
JEL Classification: Q28, H11, H77, K2, K32
Date posted: June 4, 2005
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.157 seconds