|
||||
|
||||
Implied Volatility Functions: Empirical Tests
Bernard Dumas University of Lausanne - Swiss Finance Institute; Swiss Finance Institute; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Jeff Fleming Rice University - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Management Robert E. Whaley Vanderbilt University - Owen Graduate School of Management March 1996 NBER Working Paper No. W5500 Abstract: Black and Scholes (1973) implied volatilities tend to be systematically related to the option's exercise price and time to expiration. Derman and Kani (1994), Dupire (1994), and Rubinstein (1994) attribute this behavior to the fact that the Black-Scholes constant volatility assumption is violated in practice. These authors hypothesize that the volatility of the underlying asset's return is a deterministic function of the asset price and time and develop the deterministic volatility function (DVF) option valuation model, which has the potential of fitting the observed cross-section of option prices exactly. Using a sample of S&P 500 index options during the period June 1988 through December 1993, we evaluate the economic significance of the implied deterministic volatility function by examining the predictive and hedging performance of the DV option valuation model. We find that its performance is worse than that of an ad hoc Black-Scholes model with variable implied volatilities.
JEL Classifications: G13 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: July 01, 1998 ; Last revised: May 12, 2000Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.281 seconds.