Citations (4)


Footnotes (316)



The Federalist Dimension of Regulatory Takings Jurisprudence

Stewart E. Sterk

Yeshiva University - Cardozo Law School

Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 121

Conventional wisdom teaches that the Supreme Court's takings doctrine is a muddle. Appearances, however, are deceiving. The "property" protected by the Takings Clause is defined not by a single sovereign, but by the legislative enactments and judicial pronouncements of fifty separate states. As a result, federalism concerns - underappreciated in the takings literature - do and should play an important role in shaping the Court's takings doctrine. In particular, these concerns make it inappropriate for the Court to use the Takings Clause as a vehicle for articulating a comprehensive theory of the limits on government power to regulate land. This Article focuses on the ways in which federalism concerns (together with related institutional concerns) shape takings jurisprudence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 70

Keywords: land use planning, takings clause, eminent domain, just compensation, zoning

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 8, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Sterk, Stewart E., The Federalist Dimension of Regulatory Takings Jurisprudence. Yale Law Journal, Vol. 114, p. 203, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=739235

Contact Information

Stewart E. Sterk (Contact Author)
Yeshiva University - Cardozo Law School ( email )
55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States
212-790-0230 (Phone)
212-790-0205 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,980
Downloads: 140
Download Rank: 141,495
Citations:  4
Footnotes:  316

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.671 seconds