The Inevitable Failure of Nuisance-based Theories of the Takings Clause: A Reply to Professor Claeys
Stewart E. Sterk
Yeshiva University - Cardozo Law School
Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 122
Rejecting the proposition (advanced by Professor Eric Claeys) that the Rehnquist Court's conservatives have missed an opportunity to transform takings law, this commentary demonstrates that a nuisance-based theory cannot provide a comprehensive basis for takings clause jurisprudence. The commentary further establishes that no plausible vision of originalism supports a nuisance based theory, and concludes by arguing that judicial scrutiny of state and local land use practices is less deferential than it was at the inception of the Rehnquist Court.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 19
Keywords: land use planning, nuisance, takings clauseAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: June 8, 2005
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.422 seconds