Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (190)



 


 



Autonomy Versus Equality: Voting Rights Rediscovered


Terry Smith


Fordham University School of Law


Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 89

Abstract:     
Using empirical and other evidence, this paper examines the success of Shaw v. Reno and the Supreme Court's wrongful districiting cases in reducing the role of race in politics. Observing that the Court has shown an inability to distinguish between race as such and politics, the author argues that rather than reduce the role of race, more than a decade of the wrongful districting cases has simply reduced minority political autonomy under the stalking horse of color-blindness. The author argues that this autonomy ought not be so easily disposable because it is rooted in the Constitution and in the exercise of the franchise.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 59

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 17, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Smith, Terry, Autonomy Versus Equality: Voting Rights Rediscovered. Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 89. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=745304 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.745304

Contact Information

Terry Smith (Contact Author)
Fordham University School of Law ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
212-636-6978 (Phone)
212-636-6899 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,452
Downloads: 71
Download Rank: 168,165
Footnotes:  190

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.406 seconds