Redressing Inequality in the Market for Justice: Why Access to Lawyers Will Never Solve the Problem and Why Rethinking the Role of Judges Will Help
Russell G. Pearce
Fordham University School of Law
December 19, 2011
Fordham Law Review, Vol. 73, p. 969, 2004
Commentators have argued that the solution to addressing unequal justice under law lies in increased government funding for legal services for the poor and increased pro bono hours from private lawyers. While these proposals could result in providing more lawyers for more low income people, they fail to account for the pervasive inequality resulting from the distribution of legal services primarily through the market. Given the influence of market distribution of legal services on legal outcomes, government-funded legal services and pro bono assistance can provide a valuable form of charity, but not an effective means of equalizing justice. The Essay instead suggests that a more effective way to enhance equal justice under law would be to rethink the proper role of the judge and make the judge an "active umpire" responsible for the quality of justice.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 13
Keywords: equal justice, access to justice, pro bono, legal services, legal profession, judges, judge as umpire, unequal justice, market for justice, judicial ethics, legal ethicsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: June 17, 2005 ; Last revised: December 19, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.407 seconds