Neuroeconomics and Rationality
Terrence R. Chorvat
George Mason University School of Law
Kevin A. McCabe
George Mason University - Department of Economics; George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School, Faculty
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 05-13
The assumption of rationality is both one of the most important and most controversial assumptions of modern economics. This article discusses what current experimental economic as well as neuroscience research tells us about the relationship between rationality and the mechanisms of human decision-making. The article explores the meaning of rationality, with a discussion of the distinction between traditional constructivist rationality and more ecological concepts of rationality. The article argues that ecological notions of rationality more accurately describe both human neural mechanisms as well as a wider variety of human behavior than do constructivist notions of rationality.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22
Keywords: Rationality, Law and economics
JEL Classification: K00, K11, K12
Date posted: June 23, 2005
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.282 seconds