Citations (1)


Footnotes (162)



What Google Can't Tell Us About Internet Auctions (And What It Can)

Christine Hurt

J. Reuben Clark School of Law, Brigham Young University

University of Toledo Law Review, Forthcoming

No initial public offering in the history of the United States capital markets has been as intensely discussed as the August 2004 offering of Class A Common Stock of Google, Inc. From the announcement of the IPO itself to the details of its innovative Internet auction to the post-IPO share price, the investing world has been continuously discussing Google for almost a year. One aspect of Google's IPO that received much attention before the offering was the fact that Google chose an online auction process as the mechanism to distribute its original IPO shares. In keeping with Google's nonconformist image, the founders of Google chose an IPO mechanism that is used only once or twice a year in the U.S. Many detractors of the traditional bookbuilding mechanism declared that the Google auction foreshadowed an upheaval in the cliquish investment banking industry. Although Google's auction was predicted to be the beginning of a trend, if anything, the auction process was blamed for low investor demand in the weeks leading up to the offering and a last-minute slash in the price range. In addition, in the year since the Google auction, only two other issuers have launched an online IPO.

As observers of the intersection of the Internet and the securities markets, we are left to wonder whether the Google auction was a harbinger of change, a meaningless electronic blip, or even worse, a marketing event for the public relations-conscious issuer. This article analyzes this historic IPO and explores what important the Google IPO has for the campaign for online IPO auctions. Unfortunately, because Google was a unique issuer in many respects, both positive and negative, its offering cannot be used to herald an immediate sea change in the bookbuilding IPO market. However, Google's auction will only assist other issuers in negotiating with underwriters for alternative offering mechanisms.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 37

Keywords: Initial public offering, IPO, bookbuilding, auction, Google, Morningstar, Hambrecht

JEL Classification: D44, G14

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 7, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Hurt, Christine, What Google Can't Tell Us About Internet Auctions (And What It Can). University of Toledo Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=753625

Contact Information

Christine Hurt (Contact Author)
J. Reuben Clark School of Law, Brigham Young University ( email )
430 JRCB
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
United States
80144225354 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,195
Downloads: 752
Download Rank: 21,311
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  162

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.235 seconds