Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=754484
 
 

References (32)



 
 

Citations (161)



 


 



Corporate Governance and Firm Valuation


Lawrence D. Brown


Temple University - Department of Accounting

Marcus L. Caylor


Kennesaw State University


Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2006

Abstract:     
Gompers et al. [Gompers, P., Ishii, J., Metrick, A., 2003. Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 107-155] created G-Index, a summary measure of corporate governance based on 24 firm-specific provisions, and showed that more democratic firms are more valuable. Bebchuk et al. [Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., Ferrell, A., 2005. What matters in corporate governance? Working Paper, Harvard Law School] created an entrenchment index based on six provisions underlying G-Index, and found it to fully drive the Gompers et al. (2003) valuation results. Both G-Index and the entrenchment index are based on IRRC data that is comprised of anti-takeover measures, focusing on external governance [Cremers, K.J.M., Nair, V.B., 2005. Governance mechanisms and equity prices. Journal of Finance 60, 2859-2894]. We create Gov-Score, a summary governance measure based on 51 firm-specific provisions representing both internal and external governance, and we show that a parsimonious index based on seven provisions underlying Gov-Score fully drives the relation between Gov-Score and firm value. Our results support the Bebchuk et al. (2005) findings that only a small subset of provisions marketed by corporate governance data providers are related to firm valuation, and the Cremers and Nair (2005) evidence that both internal and external governance are linked to firm value. The 51 governance provisions we consider include five that are relevant to accounting and public policy: stock option expensing, and four that are audit-related. We find none of these five measures to be related to firm valuation. We document that only one of the seven governance provisions important for firm valuation was mandated by either the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or the three major US stock exchanges. We provide researchers with an alternative measure of governance to G-Index with three distinct advantages: (1) broader in scope of governance, (2) covers more firms, and (3) more dynamic, reflecting recent changes in the corporate governance environment.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: Corporate governance, firm valuation, anti-takeover, internal and external governance

JEL Classification: D21, G30, G33, G34, G35, M41

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 7, 2005 ; Last revised: April 1, 2014

Suggested Citation

Brown, Lawrence D. and Caylor, Marcus L., Corporate Governance and Firm Valuation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=754484 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.754484

Contact Information

Lawrence D. Brown (Contact Author)
Temple University - Department of Accounting ( email )
Philadelphia, PA 19122
United States

Marcus L. Caylor
Kennesaw State University ( email )
1000 Chastain Road
Kennesaw, GA 30144
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 14,287
Downloads: 5,048
Download Rank: 708
References:  32
Citations:  161

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.468 seconds