SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

References (17)

Beta

 


 



Groundwater Resources and International Law in the Middle East Peace Process

Yoram Eckstein
Kent State University

Gabriel Eckstein
Texas Tech University - School of Law



Water International, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 154-161, June 2003

Abstract:     
Next to issues of land, water resources are the major bone of contention in the peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs. The objective of negotiations is de facto setting the clock back to the eve of the Israel War of Independence, when the Jews accepted the 1947 UN resolution of partition, while the Arabs rejected it. The Arabs now accept the principle of territorial partition, but at the same time, they demand re-apportioning of resources, mainly of water. The Palestinians contend that the facts created on the ground unilaterally by Israel during the last 50 years, namely the agricultural development and the high water consumption by the Israeli urban sector, leave them without resources necessary for their development as a modern society. Per capita annual renewable freshwater resources in the region is among the lowest in the world. Approximately 600 million m3, or about one-third of the regional fresh groundwater consumption, is annually abstracted from aquifer systems recharged at the uplands of the Upper Cretaceous partly karstified carbonate formations of Judea and Samaria, terrenes often referred to as the West Bank. Israel and the Israeli agricultural settlements established within Judea and Samaria use 495 million m3/year (or 82.5 percent) of the abstracted water, leaving to the Palestinians the remaining 105 million m3/year. Thus, while the recharge zone to the Judean and Samarian aquifer systems are within the territories with an overwhelmingly Palestinian majority, most of the discharge occurs through water wells within the Israeli administration. The situation is reversed in the Gaza Strip, where Israel allows underflow of only 7 million m3/year of groundwater across the border, a less than 10 percent contribution to the nearly 80 million m3/year overdrawn water budget of the area. The issue of water is complicated by glaringly wide disparity in per capita water consumption between the two nations. While lines on the ground may separate two nations with conflicting territorial ambitions, apportioning of groundwater between Israel and the future Palestinian State proves to be one of the most intractable issues in the Middle East Peace Process. Moreover, neither international nor domestic law provides an adequate answer to questions of ownership or rights.

Keywords: Groundwater, Middle East, Mountain Aquifer, Israel, Palestinian

JEL Classifications: K33, Q25, Q30

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: July 22, 2005 ; Last revised: October 25, 2009

Suggested Citation

Eckstein, Yoram and Eckstein, Gabriel, Groundwater Resources and International Law in the Middle East Peace Process. Water International, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 154-161, June 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=758637


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Gabriel Eckstein (Contact Author)
Texas Tech University - School of Law ( email )
1802 Hartford
Lubbock, TX 79409
United States
806-742-3990 x260 (Phone)
Yoram Eckstein
Kent State University ( email )
Kent, OH 44242
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 724
Downloads: 95
Download Rank: 81,765
References: 17

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo6 in 0.563 seconds.