Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=758904
 
 

Footnotes (544)



 


 



Freedom or Theocracy? Constitutionalism in Afghanistan and Iraq


Hannibal Travis


Florida International University College of Law


Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights, Vol. 3, No. 4, Spring 2005

Abstract:     
This article analyzes the claim that the Bush doctrine, the declaration of President George W. Bush in September 2001 that all states harboring terrorists or otherwise supporting terrorism would see their leaders replaced by force, has profoundly advanced the cause of human rights in Afghanistan and Iraq. The article focuses on the constitutional process in Afghanistan, and its thesis is that the Afghan constitution symbolizes the unmistakable liberation of Afghanistan's people from the despotic and even genocidal rule of the Taliban, but that the constitution's many provisions requiring compatibility of government policy with an unspecified code of Islamic law may frustrate democratic demands for respect for international human rights standards and the country's civil law traditions. These provisions are particularly dangerous in the hands of the Afghan religious fundamentalists that have been elevated to prominent positions in the post-Taliban political and legal system. The article proposes four test cases for judging the implementation of Afghanistan's new constitution from the perspective of democracy and individual rights: the treatment of secular political parties, the use of blasphemy laws to undermine Afghan democracy, the revival of fundamentalist punishments such as stoning and amputation, and the ongoing oppression and enslavement of Afghan women and girls. It concludes by drawing parallels between the Afghan constitutional process and the political and legal transition of Iraq from a Baathist dictatorship into a so-called Islamic democracy. As in Afghanistan, the Iraqi government installed by the U.S. and its allies has established Iraq as a religious state with judicial review of legislation for conformity to an unspecified version of Islamic law, and Iraqi women and religious minorities continue to face grave violations of their human rights.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Keywords: Human rights, human, rights, Afghanistan, Iraq, war, theocracy, Taliban, Saddam, Hussein, freedom, constitution, constitutions, constitutional, constitutionalism

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 15, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Travis, Hannibal, Freedom or Theocracy? Constitutionalism in Afghanistan and Iraq. Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights, Vol. 3, No. 4, Spring 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=758904

Contact Information

Hannibal Travis (Contact Author)
Florida International University College of Law ( email )
11200 SW 8th St.
RDB Hall 1097
Miami, FL 33199
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,680
Downloads: 407
Download Rank: 40,228
Footnotes:  544

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.266 seconds