Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=759946
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (165)



 


 



Investment-Backed Expectations and the Politics of Judicial Articulation: The Reintegration of History and the Lockean Mind in Contemporary American Jurisprudence


Kraig Odabashian


University of Chicago


UCLA Law Review, Vol. 50, p. 641, December 2002

Abstract:     
The Fifth Amendment's Just Compensation Clause is a revealing reflection of the Framers' vigilance in preserving property rights and maintaining a balance of power between citizen and state, especially in the specific context of eminent domain. The principle that the state should be generally forbidden from taking private property for public use without just compensation is a leading motif in the definition of a political culture that underpins the emergence and maintenance of a prosperous capitalist society.

In this Comment, Kraig Odabashian critiques the U.S. Supreme Court's use of the landowner's investment-backed expectations as the primary standard under which the Court has evaluated cases of government takings requiring just compensation. The author posits that the concept of "expectation," whether subjective or objective in perspective, is not the proper tool with which to analyze constitutional questions of this sort. Rather, this is a role more properly assigned to objective hermeneutics in the process of judicial epistemology.

In his central thesis, the author contends that the Just Compensation Clause ought to be reattached to its philosophical and historical origins, more specifically, that the Supreme Court ought to adopt a historical baseline test for regulatory takings in order to pursue this more abstract goal. En route to establishing this thesis, he also examines the methodological failures which have led to the intellectually weak formulation currently applied by the Court to most just compensation claims.

The author concludes by assessing the overall value of a historical baseline test in terms of its ability to generate a specific jurisprudence which is both cogent and practically operative. He approaches this task by both applying the historical baseline test to the Court's major just compensation cases and considering it in view of the specific language of the clause and the central themes of the Constitution as they are textually presented in the document itself, as well as in the Constitution's historical and philosophical animation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Keywords: Private property rights, just compensation, investment-backed expectations, regulatory takings

JEL Classification: K11

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 27, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Odabashian, Kraig, Investment-Backed Expectations and the Politics of Judicial Articulation: The Reintegration of History and the Lockean Mind in Contemporary American Jurisprudence. UCLA Law Review, Vol. 50, p. 641, December 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=759946

Contact Information

Kraig Odabashian (Contact Author)
University of Chicago ( email )
1101 East 58th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 797
Downloads: 57
Download Rank: 210,234
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  165

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.328 seconds