|
||||
|
||||
The Impact of Local Predatory Lending LawsGiang Hoaffiliation not provided to SSRN Anthony Pennington-CrossMarquette University - Dept. of Finance June 2005 FRB of St. Louis Working Paper No. 2005-049A Abstract: Local authorities in North Carolina, and subsequently in at least 23 other states, have enacted laws intending to reduce predatory and abusive lending. While there is substantial variation in the laws, they typically extend the coverage of the Federal Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA) by including home purchase and open-end mortgage credit, by lowering annual percentage rate (APR) and fees and points triggers, and by prohibiting or restricting the use of balloon payments and prepayment penalties. Empirical results show that the typical local predatory lending law tends to reduce applications and rejections, while having little impact on the flow of credit and only a modest impact on interest rates. However, the strength of the law, measured by the extent of market coverage and prohibitions, can have strong impacts on both the flow and cost of credit.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 89 Keywords: Mortgages, Predatory, Laws, Subprime JEL Classification: G21, C25 working papers seriesDate posted: July 28, 2005Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.328 seconds