SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (403)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

The Price of Macroeconomic Imprecision: How Should the Law Measure Inflation?

Jim Chen
University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law



Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 54, p. 1375, July 2003
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 05-36

Abstract:     
Inflation touches many areas of law, and the law's response to inflation constitutes a policymaking opportunity in its own right. Legislators have long realized that the use of specific dollar figures or economic formulas can render statutes obsolete. Yet Congress's response to the most basic type of economic change hardly reflects careful policymaking. Federal statutes specifying one price index strongly favor the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index (CPI) over the implicit price deflator (IPD) derived from the Bureau of Economic Affairs' computation of the gross domestic product. The IPD, however, boasts two methodological advantages that enable it to outperform the CPI in many circumstances. The IPD not only covers a deeper range of goods and services in the economy; it also eschews the fixed-weighted market-basket approach of the CPI. Both features offset the CPI's tendency to over report the rate of price change in the U.S. economy. Adopting the superior inflation index does present a daunting legal task. Because courts cannot countermand specific legislative references to one index or the other, and because neither index suits for all legislative needs, substitution of the IPD for the CPI (or vice versa) must almost invariably be achieved through piecemeal amendment.

This article begins by providing a very brief comparison of inflation with discount rates and purchasing power parity. It then discusses how legal responses to inflation can affect a wide range of interests, some of which transcend the strictly economic realm. The article focuses on manifestations of the phenomenon in three discrete areas of public law: taxation, constitutional law, and rate regulation. Congress's preferred method of accommodating macroeconomic volatility suffers from serious drawbacks. After conducting a detailed comparison of the CPI with the IPD, this article suggests potential solutions for flawed legal measures of inflation.

Keywords: Inflation, discount rates, purchasing power parity, consumer price index, implicit price deflator, price-level regulation

JEL Classifications: C10, E30, E31, L51, O47

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: August 06, 2005 ; Last revised: September 16, 2005

Suggested Citation

Chen, Jim, The Price of Macroeconomic Imprecision: How Should the Law Measure Inflation?. Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 54, p. 1375, July 2003; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 05-36. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=771244


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

James Ming Chen (Contact Author)
University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law ( email )
Wilson W. Wyatt Hall
Louisville, KY 40292
United States
502-852-6879 (Phone)
502-852-0862 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,017
Downloads: 125
Download Rank: 66,089
Footnotes: 403

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.125 seconds.