The Common Law, Labor Law, and Reality: A Response to Professor Epstein
Thomas C. Kohler
Boston College - Law School
Julius G. Getman
University of Texas at Austin - School of Law
Yale Law Journal, Vol. 92, pp. 1415-1434, 1983
Boston College Law School Research Paper No. 1983-01
In A Common Law for Labor Relations: A Critique of the New Deal Labor Litigation, Professor Epstein claimed to have undertaken serious criticism and review of the American system of labor relations as it has been structured by two pieces of New Deal era legislation. Although such a work could have been of great value to diverse disciplines, Epstein's lacks empirical scope and raises methodological questions. Instead of grappling with the subject matter seriously, Epstein merely uses the late nineteenth century form of the common law as a benchmark against which to compare the modern statutory schemes set forth in the Norris-LaGuardia Act and the National Labor Relations Act. As a result, he never answers the questions a genuine critical evaluation would have to address. In this response, the authors argue that Professor Epstein's work does not contribute in any way to our existing knowledge about labor law, it sheds no light on the reality of labor relations, and it adds nothing to our understanding of the impact labor law has had on society.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 21
Keywords: Epstein, labor relations, labor law, New Deal era legislation, Norris-LaGuardia Act, National Labor Relations ActAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 29, 2005
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.422 seconds