SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

References (33)

Beta

 


 



Sex Differences in the Acceptability of Discrimination

Timur Kuran
Duke University - Department of Economics

Edward J. McCaffery
USC Gould School of Law


April 30, 2007

USC CLEO Research Paper No. C05-7
USC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 05-17

Abstract:     
A large telephone survey conducted after the attacks of September 11 suggests that the willingness to tolerate discrimination varies significantly across domains, with a very high tolerance of discrimination against poorly educated immigrants and a strikingly low tolerance of discrimination against the genetically disadvantaged. Regardless of domain, tolerance is greater among men than among women. A survey conducted simultaneously over the World-Wide Web, using volunteer panels, replicated the phone survey results and revealed an even larger sex gap. This finding suggests that a social desirability bias leads women to overstate and men to understate their tolerance of discrimination in public.

Keywords: Discrimination, sex differences, surveys, public opinion, social desirability bias

Working Paper Series

Date posted: July 28, 2005 ; Last revised: May 15, 2007

Suggested Citation

Kuran, Timur and McCaffery, Edward J., Sex Differences in the Acceptability of Discrimination (April 30, 2007). USC CLEO Research Paper No. C05-7; USC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 05-17. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=771640


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Timur Kuran (Contact Author)
Duke University - Department of Economics ( email )
Durham, NC 27708-0204
United States
Edward J. McCaffery
USC Gould School of Law ( email )
699 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States
213-740-2567 (Phone)
213-740-5502 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,394
Downloads: 137
Download Rank: 64,438
References: 33

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.140 seconds.