|
||||
|
||||
How Changes in Financial Incentives Affect the Duration of Unemployment
Rafael Lalive University of Lausanne - Department of Economics (DEEP); Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA); CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research) Jan C. Van Ours Tilburg University - Department of Economics; Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA); Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Josef Zweimüller University of Zurich - Faculty of Business Administration - Institute for Empirical Research in Economics (IEW); Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research); Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) April 2005 CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4986 Abstract: This paper studies how changes in the two key parameters of unemployment insurance - the benefit replacement rate (RR) and the potential duration of benefits (PBD) - affect the duration of unemployment. In 1989, the Austrian government made unemployment insurance more generous by changing, simultaneously, the maximum duration of regular unemployment benefits and the earnings replacement ratio. We find that increasing the replacement ratio has much weaker disincentive effects than increasing the maximum duration of benefits. We use these results to split up the total costs to unemployment insurance funds into costs due to changes in the unemployment insurance system and costs due to behavioral responses of unemployed workers. Results indicate that costs due to behavioral responses are substantial.
Keywords: Maximum benefit duration, replacement rate, unemployment duration, unemployment insurance, policy change JEL Classifications: C41, J64, J65 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: August 09, 2005 ; Last revised: August 17, 2005Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apolloa 4 in 6.251 seconds.