The Limits of Lawyering: Legal Opinions in Structured Finance
Steven L. Schwarcz
Duke University - School of Law
Texas Law Review, Vol. 84, Fall 2005
Duke Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 69
Significant controversy surrounds the issuance of legal opinions in structured finance transactions, particularly where accountants separately use these opinions, beyond their traditional primary use, for determining whether to characterize the transactions as debt. Reflecting at its core the unresolved boundaries between public and private in financial transactions, this controversy raises important issues of first impression: To what extent, for example, should lawyers be able to issue legal opinions that create negative externalities? Furthermore, what should differentiate the roles of lawyers and accountants in disclosing information to investors? Resolution of these issues not only helps to demystify the mystique, and untangle the morass, of legal-opinion giving but also affects the very viability of the securitization industry, which dominates American, and increasingly global, financing.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 58
Keywords: structured finance transactions, accountants, investors
JEL Classification: M41, M45, G32, G38, K22Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 3, 2005 ; Last revised: November 11, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.250 seconds