Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=774408
 


 



Critical Essay: Musings on the Need to Convince Some People with Disabilities that End-of-Life Decision-Making Advocates are Not Out to Get Them


Kathy L. Cerminara


Nova Southeastern University - Shepard Broad Law Center


Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, Vol. 37, p. 343, 2005
NSU Shepard Broad Law Center Research

Abstract:     
As others have noted, the importance of the Terri Schiavo case is not legal; the various Schiavo opinions broke no new legal ground other than the constitutional questions raised when legislatures began intervening to attempt to change the outcome of the end-of-life decision-making rulings. Rather, it was activism by certain disability rights and vitalist groups that so caught the attention of the public, the politicians and the media. Focusing upon the imagery and framing utilized by vitalist activists, disabled persons saw themselves reflected in Ms. Schiavo's position, despite the fact that Ms. Schiavo lay in a persistent vegetative state. Their fear is the type of fear that those who believe in the right to self-determination in end-of-life medical decision-making must address to avoid retreat from the principles eloquently explained in the landmark case of In re Quinlan. This article traces the development of the law and politics from Quinlan to Cruzan to Schiavo as seen through the objections of persons with disabilities. It concludes by urging that disabled persons should be drawn into reasoned conversation to a greater extent so that they may see that those who supported the result in Schiavo are not out to get people with disabilities and that decisions like Schiavo in fact serve us all, including those with disabilities.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Keywords: End-of-life decision-making, disability

JEL Classification: K13, K32

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 13, 2005 ; Last revised: April 13, 2008

Suggested Citation

Cerminara, Kathy L., Critical Essay: Musings on the Need to Convince Some People with Disabilities that End-of-Life Decision-Making Advocates are Not Out to Get Them. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, Vol. 37, p. 343, 2005; NSU Shepard Broad Law Center Research. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=774408

Contact Information

Kathy L. Cerminara (Contact Author)
Nova Southeastern University - Shepard Broad Law Center ( email )
3305 College Avenue
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33314
United States
954-262-6193 (Phone)
954-262-3835 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.nsulaw.nova.edu/faculty/profiles/index.cfm?ID=18
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 906
Downloads: 75
Download Rank: 195,534

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.235 seconds