Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=776227
 


 



Mansfieldism Reconsidered


Jon Roland


Constitution Society

August 1, 2005


Abstract:     
Examines history, using original sources, showing that the original standard of due process for jury trials was to argue all questions of law in the presence of the jury, and argues that the present practice of removing legal argument from the presence of the jury is unconstitutional.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 12

Keywords: jury, trial, due process, legal argument, constitution,procedure

JEL Classification: K10, K14, K40, K41

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 16, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Roland, Jon, Mansfieldism Reconsidered (August 1, 2005). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=776227 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.776227

Contact Information

Jon Roland (Contact Author)
Constitution Society ( email )
2900 W Anderson Ln
C-200-322
Austin, TX 78757
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,371
Downloads: 112
Download Rank: 147,237

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.281 seconds