Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=782464
 


 



Blameworthiness, Intent and Cultural Dissonance: The Unequal Treatment of Cultural Defense Defendants


Nancy S. Kim


California Western School of Law


Florida Journal Law & Public Policy, Vol. 17, p. 199, 2006

Abstract:     
Criminal law assumes that the judge and jury share the same cultural and experiential framework as the defendant; accordingly, crimes are defined with this assumption as an underlying premise. In this article, I will explain how the determination of mens rea often fails to reflect culpability because the definition of crimes fail to account for the cultural dissonance that often exists between the judge/juror and the accused. In this Article, I propose an analysis and reconceptualization of intent that bridges gaps in perception and understanding attributable to cultural dissonance.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 18, 2005 ; Last revised: November 23, 2009

Suggested Citation

Kim, Nancy S., Blameworthiness, Intent and Cultural Dissonance: The Unequal Treatment of Cultural Defense Defendants. Florida Journal Law & Public Policy, Vol. 17, p. 199, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=782464

Contact Information

Nancy S. Kim (Contact Author)
California Western School of Law ( email )
225 Cedar Street
San Diego, CA 92101
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,023
Downloads: 99
Download Rank: 163,851

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.282 seconds