|
||||
|
||||
Political Polarization as a Constraint on Government: Evidence from CorruptionDavid S. BrownUniversity of Colorado at Boulder - Department of Political Science Michael TouchtonUniversity of Colorado at Boulder - Department of Political Science Andrew B. WhitfordUniversity of Georgia - Department of Public Administration and Policy 2006 Abstract: Efforts to explain corruption have increased dramatically over the last few years. The interest stems from the increasing weight economists assign to corruption when explaining economic growth and from the availability of data that measure it. Much of the effort centers on how political institutions influence perceptions of corruption. We move this debate in a new and fertile direction by addressing a previously ignored dimension: ideological polarization. Specifically, we contend that perceptions of corruption are determined not only by specific institutional features of the political system - elements of voting systems, ballot structures, or the existence of checks and balances - but by who sits at the controls. We employ pooled cross-sectional data for a broad variety of countries to test our theoretical argument. Contrary to recent findings by both economists and political scientists, we show that ideological polarization is a robust predictor of corruption.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 37 Keywords: Corruption, political institutions, political polarization JEL Classification: D72, K4, O57, 010 working papers seriesDate posted: August 18, 2005Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.797 seconds